Paying a High Price for Near Perfection

Posted by Derek Pine on Friday, February 19, 2010 at 8:17 AM  |  More From This Author »

Being in the "brand" business, we work hard to protect the brands we've been entrusted to manage and build. But what happens when a high-profile brand implodes?

As the Toyota brand continues to be tarnished by some poor business decisions, and their PR teams flounder to repair the Toyota image, I think we've gotten a chance to see the high price a brand can pay when it has dabbled with near perfection for more than 70 years.

As a used car-purchasing junkie, I can tell you firsthand that when I am looking to buy a used car, I concentrate my efforts on a few brands – Toyota being at the top. And as I’m sure most other used car enthusiasts would agree, the brand has earned it. So much so that it's one of the toughest vehicles to find a good deal on because their near-perfect image keeps the resale value so high.

However, in recent discussions around the office and with friends about the Toyota recall fiasco, many people are now shying away from owning a Toyota. They have very quickly thrown away 70 years of good equity. To which I say, “Huh?”

I have owned multiple brands of cars (used car junkie here), and I have experienced a recall of some magnitude on probably half of those vehicles. My most recent (Kia Optima) has had two. My point is this: recalls are not an unheard of thing for car manufacturers and car owners. They happen all the time. But people just don't expect bad things from Toyota. So it's been amazing to witness a brand known for relatively few mistakes get "NAILED" for having a recall. Which begs the question: "Do brands that have higher standards pay higher prices for error?"

My answer after witnessing the recent events is an unwavering and unfortunate, "YES." But while the price for failure is high, wouldn’t you rather be known for “near perfection” in the long run?

I predict that once all of Toyota's hiccups (or in this case, loud burps) pass, and business decisions are made and enforced to prevent this from happening again, Toyota will be put back into the limelight as a high-quality brand again. It will take a lot of time, PR, advertising and fundamental brand management to get it done – but selfishly I’m okay with that. Maybe now I can finally get a good deal on an old Corolla.


Share Subscribe to Flynn Wright Blog by Email Subscribe to Flynn Wright Blog by RSS

2 comments
On Monday, March 08, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Stephanie Grangaard wrote: While I do agree that one incident shouldn't ruin a brand, I believe the key reason why people are shying away from Toyota is because they broke their customers' trust. Toyota customers trusted the brand with their families and friends' safety. That’s a big deal. And of course a new slew of Toyota's commercials are boasting about how 'safe' their cars are. Not only did Toyota break their customers’ trust, but now they are blatantly lying. “Untrustworthy Liars” is enough to ruin a brand.
On Friday, March 12, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Derek wrote: Thanks for stopping by Stephanie! I've seen your comments on a couple posts recently. I really like your perspective.

Couple thoughts on what you've said. I'm not sure if Toyota is in fact lying with the new commercials. I think they are relying on the personal testimony of people who have not experienced "non-safety" to deliver the message. I could say that I feel safe in a Toyota, because in my experience I have. It's important to note that the recall issue has only effected a relatively small percentage of Toyota's that we know of, and maybe there is a certain level of sensationalism (pr and advertising from competitors…kudos to them) that has caused a little more rif-raf than is legit.

Your perspective on trust is right on. And I should of included something about that in the original post. It's that trust, that Toyota is hoping to earn back in time. Which knowing our culture… we will give them. We are pretty forgiving in the end of most things.
Add a Comment
Name:*
URL: (http://www.mysite.com)
Message:* HTML is not allowed
What is 3 p.l.u.s. 4?*
Save Comment